I saw this on Neal Boortz's Nuze:
Showing posts with label Election Thoughts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election Thoughts. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Georgia Embarrassments
Georgia once had a respectable former president. Respectable in that he may have not had a successful presidency but at one time led the way in building homes for Habitat for Humanity. He was a gracious man who was living quietly and letting his actions speak louder than words.
And then he became vocal. And now he is even more vocal. And worse yet, he called Rep. Joe Wilson a racist just because Mr. Wilson is from the South. Mr. Carter has gone off the deep end and isn't even treading water anymore.
But Georgia isn't just embarrassed by him. Rep. Hank Johnson has come out with the racism claims. Johnson replaced one moonbat named McKinney, who is still flying around the world trying to get media attention. People had hoped that Johnson would be different but within the last few days he opened his mouth to invoke the race card because someone would dare to hold a president accountable to the U.S. Constitution. Here is what Johnson said:
The Republican Party better not gloat either. Senator Saxby Chambliss had a hard fight in the last election and almost lost. Why? The Libertarian Party has become very strong here. The Democrats almost toppled Chambliss because many people are kicking the Republicans to the curb. The Democrats almost win because of the huge turn out for the Libertarian candidate. Wake up, Republicans.
Georgia is set for a mass transfer of power in the next election. I only hope people will think seriously about how they cast their votes. If a libertarian can carry the vote, then so be it. But if you are thinking about casting a vote for someone just because you are angry at the two leading parties, then make sure you are not keeping the Democrats in power. I believe that would be a worse fate for Georgia politics.
As for the two embarrassments, can we deal them to another state? Or do we have to stick to a straight flush?
And then he became vocal. And now he is even more vocal. And worse yet, he called Rep. Joe Wilson a racist just because Mr. Wilson is from the South. Mr. Carter has gone off the deep end and isn't even treading water anymore.
But Georgia isn't just embarrassed by him. Rep. Hank Johnson has come out with the racism claims. Johnson replaced one moonbat named McKinney, who is still flying around the world trying to get media attention. People had hoped that Johnson would be different but within the last few days he opened his mouth to invoke the race card because someone would dare to hold a president accountable to the U.S. Constitution. Here is what Johnson said:
"I guess we'll probably have folks putting on white hoods and white uniforms again and riding through the countryside, intimidating people. That's the logical conclusion if this kind of attitude is not rebuked."Yes, Georgia, we are the proud and the few. At least these two do not represent all of Georgia.
The Republican Party better not gloat either. Senator Saxby Chambliss had a hard fight in the last election and almost lost. Why? The Libertarian Party has become very strong here. The Democrats almost toppled Chambliss because many people are kicking the Republicans to the curb. The Democrats almost win because of the huge turn out for the Libertarian candidate. Wake up, Republicans.
Georgia is set for a mass transfer of power in the next election. I only hope people will think seriously about how they cast their votes. If a libertarian can carry the vote, then so be it. But if you are thinking about casting a vote for someone just because you are angry at the two leading parties, then make sure you are not keeping the Democrats in power. I believe that would be a worse fate for Georgia politics.
As for the two embarrassments, can we deal them to another state? Or do we have to stick to a straight flush?
Friday, August 28, 2009
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Is It Time For Clinton To Step Down?
Secretary Clinton's tour of Africa seems to be creating a new mantra: Stick foot in mouth continually.
If you haven't heard, Hillary Clinton can't seem to let go of the election in 2000. Supposedly, our republic is "still evolving" and obviously when you are the governor of a state while your brother is running for president, you must automatically be guilty of fixing the election. So 230 years of national sovereignty means we are "still evolving"?
So the political process isn't good enough for her? Is she still bitter about losing the election so many had handed her 8 years earlier? Also, we are so obviously "comparable" in our governance to that of Nigeria, which is run by corrupt people who maim and kill in order to take elections from their opponents. Right....
I saw a post by someone that actually thinks that everything is okay with what Clinton said because she was only in Nigeria - "a nation that isn't a world power". Yet there is a problem. If you google, yahoo, or bing this gaffe you will find that other world news organizations have jumped on it.
When the Secretary of State is on a tour of nations, this person is supposed to be garnering respect for the nation they represent, not dissing it. Could she have phrased it better? I think so. 2000 did challenge us as a nation because it was the first election since the early 1800s to almost be forced into the House for a final vote.
But instead of speaking about the resilience of our process and the fact that our election methods work, she wanted to play the conspiracy card that she so vehemently denounced as First Lady. Wrong answer!
Do I have a problem with our election process? Yep. I firmly believe that electoral votes should never be winner-take-all, because it does not represent the true vote! Each electoral vote should count on its own merit so that each electoral college is properly represented. But that is a case for another time.
I have had enough of her diatribes. I honestly wonder if she and others like her are sill living in the sixties where fantasy ruled.
If you haven't heard, Hillary Clinton can't seem to let go of the election in 2000. Supposedly, our republic is "still evolving" and obviously when you are the governor of a state while your brother is running for president, you must automatically be guilty of fixing the election. So 230 years of national sovereignty means we are "still evolving"?
So the political process isn't good enough for her? Is she still bitter about losing the election so many had handed her 8 years earlier? Also, we are so obviously "comparable" in our governance to that of Nigeria, which is run by corrupt people who maim and kill in order to take elections from their opponents. Right....
I saw a post by someone that actually thinks that everything is okay with what Clinton said because she was only in Nigeria - "a nation that isn't a world power". Yet there is a problem. If you google, yahoo, or bing this gaffe you will find that other world news organizations have jumped on it.
When the Secretary of State is on a tour of nations, this person is supposed to be garnering respect for the nation they represent, not dissing it. Could she have phrased it better? I think so. 2000 did challenge us as a nation because it was the first election since the early 1800s to almost be forced into the House for a final vote.
But instead of speaking about the resilience of our process and the fact that our election methods work, she wanted to play the conspiracy card that she so vehemently denounced as First Lady. Wrong answer!
Do I have a problem with our election process? Yep. I firmly believe that electoral votes should never be winner-take-all, because it does not represent the true vote! Each electoral vote should count on its own merit so that each electoral college is properly represented. But that is a case for another time.
I have had enough of her diatribes. I honestly wonder if she and others like her are sill living in the sixties where fantasy ruled.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Congratulations Mr. Obama
So, the voice of America has chosen Senator Obama as the 44th President of the United States. Congratulations.
The next four years should be very interesting. I think President-elect Obama has shown he is a capable politician. In fact, I told my dad four years ago after hearing him speak at the Democrat Convention of 2004, that he would be our next president (I hate it when I am this right). I believe he has the potential of becoming a good president. Yet, by electing Mr. Obama and putting a super majority in the House and Senate, we may have to look forward to the following:
- An economy slowing to a crawl due to higher taxes (higher taxes are to blame for the progression of the Great Depression). When Samuel told the Israelites about the dangers of a king, he said, "He'll tax your harvests and vintage to support his extensive bureaucracy." 1 Sam 8:15 (MSG) I am not calling Mr. Obama a king - just making you aware of the dangers of a growing federal government
- A new form of welfare with money being given out like candy to those who should be earning a living - we will be rewarding laziness (socialized redistribution of wealth here we come). Maybe we should do a better job showing them how to pull their own weight?
"Our orders—backed up by the Master, Jesus—are to refuse to have anything to do with those among you who are lazy and refuse to work the way we taught you. Don't permit them to freeload on the rest. We showed you how to pull your weight when we were with you, so get on with it." 2 Thessalonians 3:6-7 (MSG)
- A return of the fairness doctrine - this is very dangerous because the government will tell us what it wants us to hear not allow us to have the freedom to choose - ever read 1984?
- Secret ballots for union elections are as good as gone - goodbye privacy. I feel very sorry for those who will be in unions. They will be bullied forever more because of the Democrats lust for power (and they say absolute power doesn't corrupt? Just wait!)
- Say goodbye to school choice and vouchers and to the freedom to raise your children by placing them in a school that you choose. The democrats are ready to indoctrinate the masses (again read 1984). I also fear for homeschooling
- Oh, don't forget universal health care. Of all proposals this one has the masses of the United States blinded. Now the government will not only dictate what you hear but also whether or not you will get seen by a doctor. Just look to the messes in Canada and France and other socialized medical care
- Churches will get slammed with new lawsuits once the federal government starts fooling with the "hate laws".
Do I agree with the Democrats on anything? Sure. In fact, I think these three areas would benefit us all:
- I believe we need to work out some way in providing better health care answers for those in our country who cannot afford it. We are a wealthy and strong nation. There is not any reason we cannot do this - but we should do it without the interference of the federal government. Look at the AMA proposal.
- I believe we need a more fair and better tax system. A system that will abolish the 16th Amendment and the IRS - Look at the FairTax
- I believe in getting away from our dependency on foreign oil and turning to better fuel sources (especially renewable energy) - see the Pickens Plan
If anything, right now we should begin praying for our newly elected government. Praying for peace and strength and wisdom. Praying for humility and love and kindness. Praying for God's will to be done.
I am very excited that a black man has been elected in the United States. I just wished he was Republican (maybe Michael Steele would consider running). May God Bless America.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
I Voted, Did You?
As you head out to vote, remember what's at stake. Pray, seek the facts, and vote. Have a great election day!
Monday, November 3, 2008
Christian Voter Values Part 5
Tomorrow, we as a nation elect a new president. We can either place a Democrat in control of the top office or a Republican.
A Democrat gives the Democratic party complete control of the federal government.
A Republican may give a check against such power.
As Christians, we have to decide as to whether or not we get involved. I was just listening to some commentary online. They said the Christian conservatives do not make a difference at the polls.
Is that true? Do Christians vote values or just stay home? I hate to say it, but I think they are right. Christians tend to get their feelings hurt, stop looking at the whole picture, and sit at home - "to teach them a lesson."
If we really wanted to make the difference we say we want to make, we should stand behind a political party that stands for values. I think we need a third party that will draw those who are disappointed in the current two party system into a party that will at least deal with problems and provide answers.
But the whole idea of Christians participating is to get your voice heard. Our nations has problems with addictions (pornography and gambling), with sexual immorality (homosexuality and sex out of marriage), family issues (abortion, divorce, the definition of marriage), with education (reality versus relativism, liberal teaching, intelligent design), with Christian hate (prayer out of schools, Bible out of schools and the workplace, demonizing Christian worldview), and more.
Our nation also has a lot of other problems like the economy (we need the FairTax, we need less government), with immigration (illegals and not having a better immigration policy with our neighboring countries), with terrorism (we have to deal with oil - The Pickens Plan), and with numerous other future events such as the retirement of Supreme Court Justices.
To sit back and not be involved is a slap in the face to the country and a slap in the face to Christian values. I know we do not exactly have much to choose from but if you can't bring yourself to vote for either of the main party candidates at least throw your vote towards an alternative such as the Constitution Party. There are more than two people running for president.
Get informed and vote for values. I Vote Values - This is a great blueprint for your reading about the topics that need be addressed by our government.
A Democrat gives the Democratic party complete control of the federal government.
A Republican may give a check against such power.
As Christians, we have to decide as to whether or not we get involved. I was just listening to some commentary online. They said the Christian conservatives do not make a difference at the polls.
Is that true? Do Christians vote values or just stay home? I hate to say it, but I think they are right. Christians tend to get their feelings hurt, stop looking at the whole picture, and sit at home - "to teach them a lesson."
If we really wanted to make the difference we say we want to make, we should stand behind a political party that stands for values. I think we need a third party that will draw those who are disappointed in the current two party system into a party that will at least deal with problems and provide answers.
But the whole idea of Christians participating is to get your voice heard. Our nations has problems with addictions (pornography and gambling), with sexual immorality (homosexuality and sex out of marriage), family issues (abortion, divorce, the definition of marriage), with education (reality versus relativism, liberal teaching, intelligent design), with Christian hate (prayer out of schools, Bible out of schools and the workplace, demonizing Christian worldview), and more.
Our nation also has a lot of other problems like the economy (we need the FairTax, we need less government), with immigration (illegals and not having a better immigration policy with our neighboring countries), with terrorism (we have to deal with oil - The Pickens Plan), and with numerous other future events such as the retirement of Supreme Court Justices.
To sit back and not be involved is a slap in the face to the country and a slap in the face to Christian values. I know we do not exactly have much to choose from but if you can't bring yourself to vote for either of the main party candidates at least throw your vote towards an alternative such as the Constitution Party. There are more than two people running for president.
Get informed and vote for values. I Vote Values - This is a great blueprint for your reading about the topics that need be addressed by our government.
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Christian Voter Values Part 3
Marriage and Family
When we talk about marriage and family many immediately think about three areas: abortion, the definition of marriage, and divorce.
Marriage should always be defined as a covenant between a man and a woman to live the rest of their lives together. Homosexuality should never cross into this realm. I understand that some people would even like to have civil unions between people, but to be honest, even that leans too much toward marriage.
Because our nation was founded on Judeo-Christian beliefs, we should honor a commitment to hold on to values that have carried this nation for so many years. To deny our heritage will quickly destroy the moral fibers that hold our nation together.
Abortion is a sin. I had never thought about the lengths people go to to save a nest of baby turtle eggs as compared to the growing infant within the womb of a woman. Why is that? Why do people so eagerly dismiss the destruction of a human soul over the death of a sea turtle or other animal? Humans are not animals even if they choose to act like one.
As for divorce, I am deeply concerned about the rate of divorce among those in and out of the church. 50% of all marriages fail in the United States. Christians should be really ashamed of their lack of concern about this. Here is a really good book that helps in this area "Love, Sex, and Lasting Relationships
." Before I start a marriage seminar let me just say that we have created the wrong idea and image about marriage. Read the book it will help.
But those three areas are not the only areas we have to consider about marriage and family when dealing with public policy. What about abuse, drug addiction, sexual addictions and gambling. When Christians do not get involved in politics, they are inviting more and more damage to be done to marriage and family issues.
Just think what will happen if the Democratic party becomes fully entrenched in the Congress and the White House? They will not only pass legislation that would harm our moral integrity as a nation, but they will readily appoint judges who are activists and rule on thought and not on law. These activist judges will rule constantly against Christian beliefs.
Your voice will only be heard at the polls. Get informed and vote for values. I Vote Values - This is a great blueprint for your reading about the topics that need be addressed by our government.
When we talk about marriage and family many immediately think about three areas: abortion, the definition of marriage, and divorce.
Marriage should always be defined as a covenant between a man and a woman to live the rest of their lives together. Homosexuality should never cross into this realm. I understand that some people would even like to have civil unions between people, but to be honest, even that leans too much toward marriage.
Because our nation was founded on Judeo-Christian beliefs, we should honor a commitment to hold on to values that have carried this nation for so many years. To deny our heritage will quickly destroy the moral fibers that hold our nation together.
Abortion is a sin. I had never thought about the lengths people go to to save a nest of baby turtle eggs as compared to the growing infant within the womb of a woman. Why is that? Why do people so eagerly dismiss the destruction of a human soul over the death of a sea turtle or other animal? Humans are not animals even if they choose to act like one.
As for divorce, I am deeply concerned about the rate of divorce among those in and out of the church. 50% of all marriages fail in the United States. Christians should be really ashamed of their lack of concern about this. Here is a really good book that helps in this area "Love, Sex, and Lasting Relationships
." Before I start a marriage seminar let me just say that we have created the wrong idea and image about marriage. Read the book it will help.But those three areas are not the only areas we have to consider about marriage and family when dealing with public policy. What about abuse, drug addiction, sexual addictions and gambling. When Christians do not get involved in politics, they are inviting more and more damage to be done to marriage and family issues.
Just think what will happen if the Democratic party becomes fully entrenched in the Congress and the White House? They will not only pass legislation that would harm our moral integrity as a nation, but they will readily appoint judges who are activists and rule on thought and not on law. These activist judges will rule constantly against Christian beliefs.
Your voice will only be heard at the polls. Get informed and vote for values. I Vote Values - This is a great blueprint for your reading about the topics that need be addressed by our government.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Christian Voter Values Part 2
Education
I think one of the greatest dangers our educational system is facing comes from those who teach relativism.
Just so you understand what relativism is let me explain. According to the dictionary, relativism means any theory holding that criteria of judgment are relative, varying with individuals and their environments.
In other words, your truth is not the same as my truth. Your truth is good for you, and my truth is good for me.
You may think that sounds okay but that rules out absolute truth. They teach that absolute truth is not relevant nor acceptable. Of course their claim that absolute truth is not real is none other than absolute which totally destroys their argument but who wants to do that.
By teaching science through the eyes of relativism, people are no longer people with souls. They are animals evolving. By teaching history with relativism, facts are accepted but not required especially if the truth offends others. By teaching law with relativism, rules can be skirted and laws are not absolute especially if those laws are contrary to popular thought.
Relativism gives rise to evolution and denies the truths held by others (Christians) in intelligent design. Relativism gives rise to humanistic values (greater purpose is not found in God). When my high school went through its humanism in the classroom phase, I was told that I could not value God or the church or the Bible. Get real.
Humanism has been repackaged as relativism. This is why so many students are struggling with faith as they attend our government schools.
Relativism is not the only problem with education. Students are given the wrong message about sex - the acceptability of the homosexual practice or the acceptance of sex outside of marriage. I will deal with homosexuality in another post but will say this, I fully accept homosexuals. I love them and know they are very productive members of our society. However, I do not condone the act of homosexuality nor the ideals of that lifestyle.
As for sexual habits outside of marriage, let me tell you about the 1990s when a local high school began teaching the acceptance of condom use. A number of students started holding sex parties and syphilis cases rose dramatically. Like Henry Fonda said in "Mine, Yours, and Ours", you are not ready for sex until you are ready for marriage and kids and the entire responsibility that comes with it.
As Christians we should support various forms of education such as government schools, private schools, vouchers, and home schooling. In fact we should be asking for vouchers to be given to everyone equally - home schools included.
Another thing our education needs is a better commitment to families and students who strive for excellence by providing better incentives to achieving higher goals. Science and technology schools should be created with full tuition for students in high school who show an interest in these areas. Pay them a stipend for achievement if need be.
As Christians we should help support any programs or ministry that help lower income students. I know of a church in Atlanta that is trying to raise funds in order to create a business training program for students in high school. The kids will literally be given a business on the church property to run. What a fantastic idea.
I could go on and on, but I want to end with one thing. True wisdom comes from learning about the fear of God. There are a lot of intelligent people who walk around without any wisdom. The Bible needs to be put back into school.
If you are a Christian and you want to take part in the election, do so responsibly. Get the necessary information and vote.
I Vote Values - This is a great blueprint for your reading about the topics that need be addressed by our government.
I think one of the greatest dangers our educational system is facing comes from those who teach relativism.
Just so you understand what relativism is let me explain. According to the dictionary, relativism means any theory holding that criteria of judgment are relative, varying with individuals and their environments.
In other words, your truth is not the same as my truth. Your truth is good for you, and my truth is good for me.
You may think that sounds okay but that rules out absolute truth. They teach that absolute truth is not relevant nor acceptable. Of course their claim that absolute truth is not real is none other than absolute which totally destroys their argument but who wants to do that.
By teaching science through the eyes of relativism, people are no longer people with souls. They are animals evolving. By teaching history with relativism, facts are accepted but not required especially if the truth offends others. By teaching law with relativism, rules can be skirted and laws are not absolute especially if those laws are contrary to popular thought.
Relativism gives rise to evolution and denies the truths held by others (Christians) in intelligent design. Relativism gives rise to humanistic values (greater purpose is not found in God). When my high school went through its humanism in the classroom phase, I was told that I could not value God or the church or the Bible. Get real.
Humanism has been repackaged as relativism. This is why so many students are struggling with faith as they attend our government schools.
Relativism is not the only problem with education. Students are given the wrong message about sex - the acceptability of the homosexual practice or the acceptance of sex outside of marriage. I will deal with homosexuality in another post but will say this, I fully accept homosexuals. I love them and know they are very productive members of our society. However, I do not condone the act of homosexuality nor the ideals of that lifestyle.
As for sexual habits outside of marriage, let me tell you about the 1990s when a local high school began teaching the acceptance of condom use. A number of students started holding sex parties and syphilis cases rose dramatically. Like Henry Fonda said in "Mine, Yours, and Ours", you are not ready for sex until you are ready for marriage and kids and the entire responsibility that comes with it.
As Christians we should support various forms of education such as government schools, private schools, vouchers, and home schooling. In fact we should be asking for vouchers to be given to everyone equally - home schools included.
Another thing our education needs is a better commitment to families and students who strive for excellence by providing better incentives to achieving higher goals. Science and technology schools should be created with full tuition for students in high school who show an interest in these areas. Pay them a stipend for achievement if need be.
As Christians we should help support any programs or ministry that help lower income students. I know of a church in Atlanta that is trying to raise funds in order to create a business training program for students in high school. The kids will literally be given a business on the church property to run. What a fantastic idea.
I could go on and on, but I want to end with one thing. True wisdom comes from learning about the fear of God. There are a lot of intelligent people who walk around without any wisdom. The Bible needs to be put back into school.
If you are a Christian and you want to take part in the election, do so responsibly. Get the necessary information and vote.
I Vote Values - This is a great blueprint for your reading about the topics that need be addressed by our government.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Who Should Christians Vote For?
Here is a great message from Ed Young about who to vote for:
Politicked - Rock the Vote from Fellowship Church on Vimeo.
Politicked - Rock the Vote from Fellowship Church on Vimeo.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Senator Biden Can't Handle Tough Questions
The Obama Campaign has canceled any further interviews with this station until after the election. They just can't handle the truth, and they don't think you can either.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Christian Voter Values Part 1
The Presence of the Church in America
If there is anything Christians should be more aware of, then it is the way government is trying move Christians to the sidelines in all policy making.
Look at what happened when the "non-profit" status was introduced by President Johnson. The government by doing so, put handcuffs on how a ministry can be involved in politics. It intentionally took measures to keep the church out of politics. Look what has happened to our nations morality since.
Today, liberals are working feverishly to get Christians silenced in all public arenas - school, public meetings, prayer in legislative sessions, the ten commandments, etc.
Since the handcuffing of the church, America's moral values have plummeted. The very foundation of our country's justice system and of the laws we hold so dear was founded on Christian beliefs, and those beliefs are being thrown aside for a relativistic view.
But let put a question to you. Has the church added fuel to the fire of those who oppose Christian values in how we deal with politics? I do not want a nation that forces Christianity on its people. Accepting Christ as a personal Savior is a choice not a mandate.
However, as Christians we are mandated to stand up for principles and morality. We must ensure the protection of marriage, life, and liberty. Freedom was given birth through Christ and to walk away from Him is to walk away from that freedom.
Freedom comes with a price. It means sacrifice and patience. It means some peoples will not agree with each other but that is the beauty of our nation. Common people can have varying ideas and can present those ideas for others to reject or accept.
The church must rise up and vote not with ideals but with the truth. We must speak up about the dangers of sexual immorality, of improper social behaviors, of uneducated children, of mishandling our economy, and more.
So don't get discouraged. Get informed. Vote but do so with prayer and vigilance. Pay attention to what is being said not what is being presented. Listen to the truth because as we should believe, the truth sets us free.
Below is a link to a pdf from I Vote Values. I recommend reading it.
I Vote Values - This is a great blueprint for your reading about the topics that need be addressed by our government.
If there is anything Christians should be more aware of, then it is the way government is trying move Christians to the sidelines in all policy making.
Look at what happened when the "non-profit" status was introduced by President Johnson. The government by doing so, put handcuffs on how a ministry can be involved in politics. It intentionally took measures to keep the church out of politics. Look what has happened to our nations morality since.
Today, liberals are working feverishly to get Christians silenced in all public arenas - school, public meetings, prayer in legislative sessions, the ten commandments, etc.
Since the handcuffing of the church, America's moral values have plummeted. The very foundation of our country's justice system and of the laws we hold so dear was founded on Christian beliefs, and those beliefs are being thrown aside for a relativistic view.
But let put a question to you. Has the church added fuel to the fire of those who oppose Christian values in how we deal with politics? I do not want a nation that forces Christianity on its people. Accepting Christ as a personal Savior is a choice not a mandate.
However, as Christians we are mandated to stand up for principles and morality. We must ensure the protection of marriage, life, and liberty. Freedom was given birth through Christ and to walk away from Him is to walk away from that freedom.
Freedom comes with a price. It means sacrifice and patience. It means some peoples will not agree with each other but that is the beauty of our nation. Common people can have varying ideas and can present those ideas for others to reject or accept.
The church must rise up and vote not with ideals but with the truth. We must speak up about the dangers of sexual immorality, of improper social behaviors, of uneducated children, of mishandling our economy, and more.
So don't get discouraged. Get informed. Vote but do so with prayer and vigilance. Pay attention to what is being said not what is being presented. Listen to the truth because as we should believe, the truth sets us free.
Below is a link to a pdf from I Vote Values. I recommend reading it.
I Vote Values - This is a great blueprint for your reading about the topics that need be addressed by our government.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
A Question Mr. Obama Needs to Answer
I have thought about the use of Ayers and Wright to describe the political character of Senator Obama. Yes, they are relevant. Yes, they do show as a negative on his political character.
I think the most relevant question, however, has to do with Mr. Obama's relationship with an organization that is at the root cause of our mortgage woes which have sunk our economy - ACORN.
I want to know why Mr. Obama supposedly gave $800,000 to this organization. I want to know what he thinks about an organization that does not police its subgroups. Remember, Acorn's voter fraud dealings are nationwide - this is not an "isolated" incident.
I want Mr. Obama to come out and attack this or any grouped that does not use public funds in a pure manner. I would love to see him ask for his money back so he can give it to an organization that really works for the benefit of a community.
In my opinion, Mr. Obama needs to answer these questions if we are to take him seriously on any issue. It goes right to how carelessly he may distribute the hard earned money he plans to take by force using the guise of the IRS so he can "redistribute the wealth".
I would also love to hear why his comment on redistribution of wealth comes so closely to that of the Marxist Communist view. But who will ask it?
I think the most relevant question, however, has to do with Mr. Obama's relationship with an organization that is at the root cause of our mortgage woes which have sunk our economy - ACORN.
I want to know why Mr. Obama supposedly gave $800,000 to this organization. I want to know what he thinks about an organization that does not police its subgroups. Remember, Acorn's voter fraud dealings are nationwide - this is not an "isolated" incident.
I want Mr. Obama to come out and attack this or any grouped that does not use public funds in a pure manner. I would love to see him ask for his money back so he can give it to an organization that really works for the benefit of a community.
In my opinion, Mr. Obama needs to answer these questions if we are to take him seriously on any issue. It goes right to how carelessly he may distribute the hard earned money he plans to take by force using the guise of the IRS so he can "redistribute the wealth".
I would also love to hear why his comment on redistribution of wealth comes so closely to that of the Marxist Communist view. But who will ask it?
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Liberals and the FairTax Part 2
Yesterday I touched upon how the FairTax is a great financial assistance program for the poor. For Democrats that is a big win with this tax renewal proposal.
Today, I want to add to something I hinted to yesterday - the FairTax taxes the rich more!
Just think, a consumption tax includes every thing that is consumable. The rich buy expensive products and will have to pay full taxes on them. They will not be able to use a tax loophole to get out of paying taxes, unlike how they are able to use tax loopholes to skirt out of income taxes.
If you want to get at the rich, this is a better way. Senator Obama's plan will do everything to slow down our economy including sending jobs overseas. Senator MCain's plan does not do enough to stir the job growth and stimulate corporations to bring the jobs back to the United States.
By taking the pseudo corporate taxes off the corporations (corporations do not pay taxes, they just pass them on to those who purchase their products), corporations will be more willing to bring the jobs home. By putting more money in the pockets of the poor and the middle class, they will be able to spend more and stimulate job growth through the growth gained by small businesses through spending.
Just look at these two quotes from the FairTax website:
The word Democrat holds one ideal - that all of us are created equal. Shouldn't our tax code reflect that ideal?
Today, I want to add to something I hinted to yesterday - the FairTax taxes the rich more!
Just think, a consumption tax includes every thing that is consumable. The rich buy expensive products and will have to pay full taxes on them. They will not be able to use a tax loophole to get out of paying taxes, unlike how they are able to use tax loopholes to skirt out of income taxes.
If you want to get at the rich, this is a better way. Senator Obama's plan will do everything to slow down our economy including sending jobs overseas. Senator MCain's plan does not do enough to stir the job growth and stimulate corporations to bring the jobs back to the United States.
By taking the pseudo corporate taxes off the corporations (corporations do not pay taxes, they just pass them on to those who purchase their products), corporations will be more willing to bring the jobs home. By putting more money in the pockets of the poor and the middle class, they will be able to spend more and stimulate job growth through the growth gained by small businesses through spending.
Just look at these two quotes from the FairTax website:
- The FairTax is the only plan that targets and taxes existing wealth, not the fruits of labor. The FairTax will tax every dollar of accumulated wealth in the most efficient way possible when it is spent.
- The FairTax promotes the American Dream. The FairTax makes home ownership more affordable because used homes are totally untaxed, and three out of four homebuyers buy used homes.
The word Democrat holds one ideal - that all of us are created equal. Shouldn't our tax code reflect that ideal?
Is Senator Barack Obama a Democrat, Socialist, Communist?
Democrat - American Heritage Dictionary
1. An advocate of democracy.
2. One who believes in social equality or discounts distinctions in rank.
Socialist - American Heritage Dictionary (socialism)
1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.
Communism - American Heritage Dictionary
1. A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
2. Communism
1. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
2. The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Liberals and the FairTax Part 1
I am going to use this week to urge Democrats and other liberals to take a serious look at the FairTax. With the current meltdown of the economy, the FairTax is a serious and viable tax replacement plan.
Today, I want to show you that the FairTax is a great financial assistance program for the poor.
First, by repealing the 16th Amendment and ridding ourselves of the IRS, we can for the first time in almost one hundred years take federal taxes off those who are poor.
Literally, everyone would receive their entire paycheck (no social security, medicare, or federal income tax deductions).
Second, everyone would receive a prebate at the beginning on the month to offset any sales taxes. The more you make the less you receive. The less you make the more you receive at the beginning of every month.
That means that not only do the poor not pay taxes, they also receive entitlements to help them pay for groceries, gas, and more.
Just think of the buying power that the poor will gain. They will not have to have those embarrassing food stamps. They will get money to help take care of their immediate needs. Low income households will receive 5 times the benefit of the higher income households.
This is the most progressive tax ever presented. Every Democrat should be jumping on this. Don't let your political hopefuls lie to you.
They are against this because they lose money from the Washington D.C. political machine that is working very hard to sway their vote.
Their argument is that the FairTax will have to be more to cover the costs. What they do not tell you is that they would be forced to cut spending. They do not want you to know that this tax would force them to work harder to keep spending under control.
What would spending control do for the U.S.?
The largest problem the U.S. dollar has right now is that the United States is in debt. Every time the Treasury prints more money it creates more inflation. The higher the inflation the more volatile the interest rates.
Spending controls force the government to balance the budget which reduces the amount of tax needed to run government. Don't let them deceive you. Vote for the FairTax by putting FairTax candidates in office.
Today, I want to show you that the FairTax is a great financial assistance program for the poor.
First, by repealing the 16th Amendment and ridding ourselves of the IRS, we can for the first time in almost one hundred years take federal taxes off those who are poor.
Literally, everyone would receive their entire paycheck (no social security, medicare, or federal income tax deductions).
Second, everyone would receive a prebate at the beginning on the month to offset any sales taxes. The more you make the less you receive. The less you make the more you receive at the beginning of every month.
That means that not only do the poor not pay taxes, they also receive entitlements to help them pay for groceries, gas, and more.
Just think of the buying power that the poor will gain. They will not have to have those embarrassing food stamps. They will get money to help take care of their immediate needs. Low income households will receive 5 times the benefit of the higher income households.
This is the most progressive tax ever presented. Every Democrat should be jumping on this. Don't let your political hopefuls lie to you.
They are against this because they lose money from the Washington D.C. political machine that is working very hard to sway their vote.
Their argument is that the FairTax will have to be more to cover the costs. What they do not tell you is that they would be forced to cut spending. They do not want you to know that this tax would force them to work harder to keep spending under control.
What would spending control do for the U.S.?
The largest problem the U.S. dollar has right now is that the United States is in debt. Every time the Treasury prints more money it creates more inflation. The higher the inflation the more volatile the interest rates.
Spending controls force the government to balance the budget which reduces the amount of tax needed to run government. Don't let them deceive you. Vote for the FairTax by putting FairTax candidates in office.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
A Real Health Care Plan
If you haven't heard, there is a plan being presented by the American Medical Association (AMA). They have been placing ads throughout television. Visit www.voicefortheuninsured.org to see their proposal. You can also see a layout of their plan on this pdf - AMA Health Plan
My wife and I are having to change our health care plan again. It seems that our health care cronies have been swayed by two national companies. I am not complaining, because by God's grace we have an opportunity to receive health care coverage. Many people cannot.
So now we have to choose between the HRA (Health Reimbursement Account) which is a new kind of PPO, a HMO, or a standard PPO. There is one more which is a high deductible plan that also allows for an HSA. We are leaning towards the HRA.
The AMA plan brings my attention back to those who cannot afford or who do not understand how to get insurance (because it is so convoluted - my wife had me go to the insurance meeting because I understand it even though the insurance is offered through her employer). Last night both candidates had a chance to really step out and hit the nail on the head but I think both missed.
As Mike Huckabee has said this morning, we saw two Senators in the debate last night, not a president. A president has to come out and say this is where we are going, and then help lead the people that direction. Neither of the candidates have done this yet. Both are probably competent people but neither are connecting in a way that says - I am a presidential candidate.
While everyone is out stumping for their pick - I am waivering. I really want to vote for McCain because I do think much of Mr. Obama's plan could lead us into a more socialized form of government.
Why did Newt not run? Why were Republicans so adamant about supporting Mr. McCain over Mike Huckabee or even Mitt Romney? Mike Huckabee is a better communicator and I honestly believe he could have had a better showing in both debates.
Senator McCain needs to read his website and use the material there. His debate team needs to read his website and have a better compare and contrast / cause and effect sessions with him. I am glad for Rick Eddy, my Georgia history teacher in 8th grade, who used to make up tests with questions like "Compare and Contrast the Pros and Cons of the ....." or "Give the cause and effect of the ...." but I digress.
The debates have been a total failure, but that could be because the candidate negotiators for the debate are really tying the hands of the moderators (all so far lean liberal) with a bunch of stupid rules. Are they afraid that their candidate will actually be revealed?
Folks, don't worry about the market. It will recover. Keep your heads held high and help one another. Let's be Americans! Pay off your consumer debt and stop creating more. And that's my soapbox for today.
My wife and I are having to change our health care plan again. It seems that our health care cronies have been swayed by two national companies. I am not complaining, because by God's grace we have an opportunity to receive health care coverage. Many people cannot.
So now we have to choose between the HRA (Health Reimbursement Account) which is a new kind of PPO, a HMO, or a standard PPO. There is one more which is a high deductible plan that also allows for an HSA. We are leaning towards the HRA.
The AMA plan brings my attention back to those who cannot afford or who do not understand how to get insurance (because it is so convoluted - my wife had me go to the insurance meeting because I understand it even though the insurance is offered through her employer). Last night both candidates had a chance to really step out and hit the nail on the head but I think both missed.
As Mike Huckabee has said this morning, we saw two Senators in the debate last night, not a president. A president has to come out and say this is where we are going, and then help lead the people that direction. Neither of the candidates have done this yet. Both are probably competent people but neither are connecting in a way that says - I am a presidential candidate.
While everyone is out stumping for their pick - I am waivering. I really want to vote for McCain because I do think much of Mr. Obama's plan could lead us into a more socialized form of government.
Why did Newt not run? Why were Republicans so adamant about supporting Mr. McCain over Mike Huckabee or even Mitt Romney? Mike Huckabee is a better communicator and I honestly believe he could have had a better showing in both debates.
Senator McCain needs to read his website and use the material there. His debate team needs to read his website and have a better compare and contrast / cause and effect sessions with him. I am glad for Rick Eddy, my Georgia history teacher in 8th grade, who used to make up tests with questions like "Compare and Contrast the Pros and Cons of the ....." or "Give the cause and effect of the ...." but I digress.
The debates have been a total failure, but that could be because the candidate negotiators for the debate are really tying the hands of the moderators (all so far lean liberal) with a bunch of stupid rules. Are they afraid that their candidate will actually be revealed?
Folks, don't worry about the market. It will recover. Keep your heads held high and help one another. Let's be Americans! Pay off your consumer debt and stop creating more. And that's my soapbox for today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
